What is the Information Ratio?
Measuring Performance Beyond the Basics
What is the Information Ratio?
When evaluating investments, understanding whether performance is consistent or merely luck-driven is crucial. The Information Ratio (IR) helps by quantifying how effectively an investment manager outperforms a benchmark while accounting for the consistency of those returns.
This metric provides insight into how much extra return is achieved for each unit of risk taken, offering a clearer picture of an investment's reliability relative to its benchmark, such as the S&P 500.
While the Sharpe Ratio measures risk-adjusted performance relative to a risk-free rate, the Information Ratio focuses specifically on performance relative to a benchmark, making it particularly useful for evaluating active fund managers.
The Formula
The Information Ratio is calculated as:
\[ \text{Information Ratio (IR)} = \frac{R_p - R_b}{\sigma_{(R_p - R_b)}} \]
Where:
\(R_p\): The return of the investment or fund.
\(R_b\): Benchmark Return - The return of a relevant index or benchmark.
\(\sigma_{(R_p - R_b)}\): Tracking Error - The standard deviation of the portfolio’s excess return over the benchmark.
The higher the Information Ratio, the better the investment manager is at delivering consistent outperformance.
What is a “good” Information Ratio?
- Above 0.5: Generally considered good.
- Above 1: Excellent, indicating consistent and significant outperformance.
- Below 0: Poor performance relative to the benchmark.
Example
Let's look at a concrete example to understand how the Information Ratio (IR) evaluates a portfolio manager's performance relative to a benchmark.
We'll use the "Magnificent Seven" stocks—Apple (AAPL), Microsoft (MSFT), Alphabet (GOOGL), Amazon (AMZN), Nvidia (NVDA), Meta Platforms (META), and Tesla (TSLA)—and their returns for the year 2023.
Imagine a benchmark portfolio that allocates funds equally among these seven stocks. Here's a summary of their 2023 returns:
| Company | Ticker | 2023 return |
Apple |
AAPL |
+48.2% |
Microsoft |
MSFT |
+56.8% |
Alphabet |
GOOGL |
+58.3% |
Amazon |
AMZN |
+80.9% |
Nvidia |
NVDA |
+238.9% |
Meta Platforms |
META |
+194.1% |
Tesla |
TSLA |
+101.7% |
To calculate the benchmark's return, we average the returns of these stocks:
\[ R_b = \frac{48.2\% + 56.8\% + 58.3\% + 80.9\% + 238.9\% + 194.1\% + 101.7\%}{7} \approx 111.27\% \]
Now, consider a portfolio manager who adjusts the weights to capitalize on anticipated outperformers. Suppose the manager assigns the following weights:
| Company | Weight | 2023 return |
Apple |
15% |
+48.2% |
Microsoft |
10% |
+56.8% |
Alphabet |
10% |
+58.3% |
Amazon |
15% |
+80.9% |
Nvidia |
25% |
+238.9% |
Meta Platforms |
15% |
+194.1% |
Tesla |
10% |
+101.7% |
To find the portfolio's return, we calculate the weighted sum of individual returns:
\[ R_p = (w_1 \times R_1) + (w_2 \times R_2) + \dots + (w_n \times R_n) \]
\[ = (15\% \times 48.2\%) + (10\% \times 56.8\%) + (10\% \times 58.3\%) + (15\% \times 80.9\%) + (25\% \times 238.9\%) + (15\% \times 194.1\%) + (10\% \times 101.7\%) \]
\[ = 7.23\% + 5.68\% + 5.83\% + 12.14\% + 59.73\% + 29.12\% + 10.17\% \]
\[ \approx 129.9\% \]
Let’s assume the tracking error (standard deviation of the excess returns) is 18%, a reasonable level for actively managed portfolios.
Finally, let's compute the Information Ratio for this portfolio manager:
\[ \text{IR} = \frac{\text{Portfolio Return} - \text{Benchmark Return}}{\text{Tracking Error}} \]
\[ \text{IR} = \frac{129.9\% - 111.27\%}{18\%} \]
\[ \text{IR} = \frac{18.63\%}{18\%} \approx 1.04 \]
Conclusion:
With an Information Ratio of approximately 1.04, the portfolio manager demonstrates strong and consistent outperformance relative to the benchmark, while taking a moderate level of risk. This aligns with the typical range of “excellent” IR values in real-world scenarios.
What are the Risks?
These are some of the limitations of using Information Ratio:
-
Dependent on the Benchmark: The choice of benchmark can heavily influence the ratio. A poorly chosen benchmark may distort results.
-
Short-Term Focus: IR is typically calculated over a specific time period, which may not reflect long-term performance.
-
Doesn’t Capture All Risks: Like the Sharpe Ratio, it doesn’t account for risks beyond volatility, such as liquidity risk.
Sharpe Ratio vs Information Ratio
When to Use Them
For passive investments like index funds, focus more on the Sharpe Ratio since the goal is to maximize returns for total risk.
For actively managed funds or strategies, analyze both the Sharpe Ratio and the Information Ratio to assess if the fund adds value beyond its benchmark while maintaining good risk-adjusted returns.
For actively managed funds or strategies, analyze both the Sharpe Ratio and the Information Ratio to assess if the fund adds value beyond its benchmark while maintaining good risk-adjusted returns.
Our Quantitative Finance course is coming soon!
If you're eager to dive deeper into growing your assets, sign up for our newsletter! You'll receive updates whenever we share valuable insights or content tailored to your interests.